May 21, 2012



To:                   SPEEA Council Members


From:               SPEEA Legislative and Public Affairs Committee


Subject:            PRE-SUBMITTED NEW BUSINESS:  Support For The Principles Of Trade Reform Promoted By The Coalition For A Prosperous America And Supported By The AFL-CIO.




The Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA) is a national non-profit organization made up of American manufacturers, farmers and organized labor.  This multi-sector coalition advocates for trade policy reform to better serve national economic interests.  (


After six months of deliberation, CPA recently released guiding principles for Congress and the Administration as they negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other future trade agreements (see enclosed). 


In addition to stressing balanced trade and a national economic strategy, the CPA principles address: reciprocal market access, unfair competition with state-owned commercial enterprises, currency manipulation, rules of origin, trade law enforcement, the impact of foreign consumption taxes, import surges/product safety in agricultural imports, the protection of domestic procurement policies, trade agreement sunsets and strong labor provisions. 


CPA leadership has directly requested SPEEA’s support of these principles. Almost 90 other businesses and organizations have already signed on to CPA’s “21st Century Trade Agreement Principles”. 



Related SPEEA Motions

M11-036 (September 20, 2011): SPEEA recognizes the value of CPA and recommended SPEEA share information about CPA with a wider audience of labor and other community based groups.

M11-009 (March 10, 2011): SPEEA endorses a policy of supporting legislative and policy actions that prevent or discourage China or other countries from manipulating the exchange rate of its foreign currency.

M11-003 (February 1, 2011): SPEEA opposes ratification of the three trade agreements negotiated between the US and Korea, Columbia and Panama. The SPEEA Council opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership as long as it conforms to the NAFTA model. The Council authorizes SPEEA staff and delegates to lobby in Congress to reject the agreements.



SPEEA L&PA Committee Recommendation

The SPEEA Legislative and Public Affairs Committee recommends passage of this motion.




It is moved that: The SPEEA Council support the principles of trade reform promoted by the Coalition for a Prosperous America and supported by the AFL-CIO.  As such, SPEEA will be signatory to the “21st Century Trade Agreement Principles” document to be shared with Congress and the Administration. 







·         Labor is only one stakeholder so our issues are balanced with those of other constituencies; as such, there are a minority of principles highlighted that would not otherwise be a top priority of SPEEA’s.

700 12th Street NW, Suite 700 - Washington, DC 20005  |  615 Boardman Street - Sheffield, MA 01257
  tel: 202-688-5145
email:  |  website:

Click here to unsubscribe

Virtually everyone agrees that U.S. trade agreements with other countries can and should be improved to better serve our national economic interests.  However, we have lacked broad agreement on just exactly what those improvements should be.  We now have multi-organizational agreement that comprehensively specifies what a 21st Century Trade Agreement should contain to benefit America. 

We invite your company or organization to consider and sign-on to this document called "21st Century Trade Agreement Principles."

CPA led an exhaustive, multi-organizational committee effort, for six months, to create and explain thirteen core principles that should be in any future trade agreement.  

Committee members included:

*    John Arnett, Copper and Brass Fabricators Council
*    Charles Blum, IAS Group and CPA Director of Government Relations
*    Bill Bullard, Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America
*    Celeste Drake, AFL-CIO
*    Dave Frengel, Penn United Technologies, Saxonburg PA
*    Bill Hickey, Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp, Chicago IL
*    Cass Johnson, National Council of Textile Organizations
*    Joe Logan, CPA Agriculture Co-Chair and Ohio Environmental Council
*    Brian O'Shaughnessy, Revere Copper Products

The goal was to create solid principles from a macro-economic perspective to provide a unified, multi-sector agreement to guide Congress, the Administration and trade negotiators.  The committee considered major past trade failings including persistent trade deficits, state owned enterprises, lack of enforcement, and foreign government tactics to replace any trade concessions with new barriers and subsidies.  We considered U.S. interests and past performance, rather than ideology.

This is a perfect time to consider these 21st Century Trade Agreement Principles.  We are not facing the pressure of a pending trade agreement, but the federal government is in negotiations for a new multi-lateral agreement, the Trans-Pacific Partnership.  By considering and adopting these 21st Century Trade Agreement Principles, your company or organization can help the U.S. establish a framework for a coherent national trade policy, which then can be used to measure whether future trade agreements deserve support or not.

We now are seeking signatory companies or organizations across the country.  (At this stage, we are not inviting individual persons to sign on.)  If you are affiliated with or employed by a company or organization, please ask your management or leadership to sign-on to these "21st Century Trade Agreement Principles".


Brian O'Shaughnessy
Chief Co-Chair, Coalition for a Prosperous America
Chairman, Revere Copper Products, Rome NY


21st Century Trade Agreement Principles

Trade agreements are business contracts between countries. They involve rights and obligations, concessions and benefits, performance and breach. The United States has stated that it will negotiate “21st Century Trade Agreements” which presumably will improve upon those of the 20th Century. New trade agreements must include the following principles to benefit America.

1. Balanced Trade: Trade agreements must contribute to a national goal of achieving a manageable balance of trade over time.

Comments: Sustained net exports are needed to offset the cumulative trade deficits of recent decades to ultimately achieve a long term, manageable trade balance. This is a results oriented, quantitative goal. Trade agreement negotiations focused upon procedural, tariff and subsidy concessions often ignore trade balance outcomes. Further, an “export only” goal ignores the net trade balance. The U.S. national interest lies in reducing and eliminating its currently massive trade deficit and resulting foreign indebtedness.

2. National Trade, Economic and Security Strategy: Trade agreements must strive to optimize value added supply chains within the U.S. - from raw material to finished product - pursuant to a national trade and economic strategy that creates jobs, wealth and sustained growth. The agreements must also ensure national security by recapturing production necessary to rebuild America’s defense industrial base.

Comments: The U.S. has tended to pursue trade liberalization as an end in itself. Instead, trade negotiations should be conducted to further a national trade, economic and security strategy. The U.S. has lacked a strategy to produce more of what the nation consumes, in both the civilian and defense markets. Conversely, our major trading rivals pursue strategies to ensure persistent trade surpluses and promote the offshoring of U.S. manufacturing. As a result, the U.S. is losing critical mass of production capacity and skilled workers. The term “optimize value added supply chains” is intended to establish that the full supply chain has more value than the sum of its parts in terms of increased production, employment, innovation and growth. Trade negotiations should further - and their success should be measured by achievement of - those goals not just for selected sub-parts but for the supply chain as a whole.

3. Reciprocity: Trade agreements must ensure that foreign country policies and practices as well as their tariff and non-tariff barriers provide fully reciprocal access for U.S. goods and services. The agreements must provide that no new barriers or subsidies outside the scope of the agreement nullify or impair the concessions bargained for.

Comments: Reciprocity is a fundamental tenet of trade law. This principle rejects the proposition that the U.S. should lead with trade barrier reductions, even without equivalent concessions from the other country, as a strategy to persuade other countries to eventually and voluntarily lower their barriers. The best approach is to extract those concessions during bargaining to ensure fully reciprocal access. Further, past trade agreements have permitted the other country to erect substitute trade barriers, which are not explicitly covered by the terms of the agreement, that nullify the benefits of the concessions. Any new agreement must address the problem of substitute barriers or subsidies through explicit, enforceable language.

4. State Owned Commercial Enterprises: Trade agreements must encourage the transformation of state owned and state controlled commercial enterprises (SOEs) to private sector enterprises. In the interim, trade agreements must ensure that SOEs do not distort the free and fair flow of trade - throughout supply chains - and investment between the countries.

Comments: The growth of state owned or state controlled commercial enterprises (collectively SOEs) in global commerce is a substantial and disruptive trade challenge. SOEs are inherently subsidized, ungoverned by and/or resistant to market forces. They crowd out private commerce and are often government policy tools. SOEs should not gain the benefits of new trade agreements or be allowed to disrupt commerce or investment in the private market. By their nature, SOEs disrupt downstream competition, which must be addressed. Trade agreement language should (1) deny new preferences to SOEs and (2) include provisions - whether duties, quotas or other means - that restrict the impact of SOEs commercial and investment activities.

5. Currency: Trade agreements must classify prolonged currency undervaluation as a per se violation of the agreement without the need to show injury or intent.

Comments: Fair and market determined exchange rates are fundamental to realizing the benefits of a trade agreement. Persistent currency undervaluation nullifies and impairs concessions obtained through bargaining. General agreement exists that persistent currency undervaluation is a problem, but the approach has been to engage in multilateral, diplomatic negotiations separate from trade negotiations. The diplomatic approach has borne no fruit. This principle makes clear that currency valuation issues must be a part of a trade agreement, and not treated separately.

6. Rules of origin: Trade agreements must include rules of origin to maximize benefits for U.S. based supply chains and minimize free ridership by third parties. Further, all products must be labeled or marked as to country(s) of origin as a condition of entry.

Comments: Rules of origin determine whether a product or its components “originate” within a contracting country(s) and thus qualifies for favorable tariff treatment. Without rules of origin, any product could be trans-shipped from third countries without restriction, causing free ridership problems where third countries benefit without negotiation-extracted concessions. Stronger origin rules will tend to benefit supply chains within the U.S. while disincentivizing the utilization or trans-shipment of third country products. Rules may vary by product; however, the preservation and/or expansion of the U.S. supply chain should be a substantial governing principle.

7. Enforcement: Trade agreements must provide effective and timely enforcement mechanisms, including expedited adjudication and provisional remedies. Such provisional remedies must be permitted where the country deems that a clear breach has occurred which causes or threatens injury, and should be subject to review under the agreements’ established dispute settlement mechanisms.

Comments: Effective enforcement is key to political support for trade agreements and the trading system itself. Current enforcement mechanisms are too expensive, time consuming and beyond the means of many affected industries to be effective. The problem is exacerbated by the lack of transparency of the details of other countries’ compliance. Provisional remedies would permit a contracting country to take immediate action in applicable cases, while preserving the right of the other country to challenge the provisional action through ordinary dispute settlement mechanisms.

8. Border Adjustable Taxes: Trade agreements must neutralize the subsidy and tariff impact of the border adjustment of foreign consumption taxes.

Comments: Foreign consumption (indirect) taxes are charged to U.S. exports, and they are rebated when foreign companies export to the U.S. Because of our reliance upon income (direct) taxes, the U.S. is unable to reciprocate. The result is that U.S. exports are double taxed and foreign imports to the U.S. are largely untaxed. This is a major cause of offshoring and our persistent trade imbalance. This principle must apply equally to negotiation, performance and enforcement of all trade agreements.

9. Perishable and Cyclical Products: Trade agreements must include special safeguard mechanisms to address import surges in perishable and seasonal agricultural product markets, including livestock markets.

Comments: The WTO and past trade promotion authority statutes recognize that producers of perishable and seasonal agricultural products are particularly susceptible to trade surges arising from over-production, adverse weather or other causes. Short shelf life and/or short selling season characteristics result in producers being unable to store the products until prices rise. Immediate and automatic relief based upon price and/or quantity measures are necessary to prevent irreparable industry harm in these sectors.

10. Food and Product Safety and Quality: Trade agreements must ensure import compliance with existing U.S. food and product safety and quality standards and must not inhibit changes to or improvements in U.S. standards. The standards must be effectively enforced at U.S. ports.

Comments: Past negotiations have often treated health, quality and safety standards as trade barriers without sufficient regard for important public safety and quality goals. The result has sometimes been downward harmonization of safety and quality measures under a trade facilitation rationale. Enforcement as to imported products should effectively equal enforcement as to domestic products.

11. Domestic Procurement: Trade agreements must preserve the ability of federal, state and local governments to favor domestic producers in government, or government funded, procurement.

Comments: Domestic taxpayers, globally, expect their tax dollars to be spent on domestic production. Government procurement is, in large part, a policy tool rather than true free market commerce. The federal, state and local governments of the United States are, collectively, the biggest consumers in the world. True reciprocity cannot exist because there is a mismatch in the size of - and transparency of - government procurement markets.

12. Temporary vs. Permanent Agreements: Trade agreements must be sunsetted, subject to renegotiation and renewal. Renewal must not occur if the balance of benefits cannot be restored.

Comments: Trade negotiators agree to language based upon expectations and judgment in pursuit of national goals. However, goals may not be achieved or expectations may not be met. Just as business contracts do not last forever, neither should agreements between countries. Therefore, it is prudent to make such agreements time-limited to ensure that they continue to provide balanced benefits as circumstances change. If a balance does not materialize, the agreement should be renegotiated or discontinued.

13. Labor: Trade agreements must include enforceable labor provisions to ensure that lax labor standards and enforcement by contracting countries do not result in hidden subsidies to the detriment of U.S.-based workers and producers.

Comments: Fair labor standards will simultaneously improve U.S. competitiveness and increase worker prosperity in other countries, enabling them to become consumers of U.S. goods. In the 2002 Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) statute, Congress instructed trade negotiators to pursue goals including: “to promote respect for worker rights and the rights of children consistent with core labor standards of the ILO...and an understanding of the relationship between trade and worker rights”. Congress further defined those core labor standards as: “(A) the right of association; (B) the right to organize and bargain collectively; (C) a prohibition on the use of any form of forced or compulsory labor; (D) a minimum age for the employment of children; and (E) acceptable conditions of work with respect to minimum wages, hours of work, and occupational safety and health.”